Bush among ‘Most Wanted’ [Archives:2003/624/Opinion]

archive
February 24 2003

BY YAZAN AL- SAGHIRY
One of the most famous programs in the USA is “America's Most Wanted.” As we all know, crime in the greatest power in the world is very high, although the government is waging a cruel war against it.
I've been told that the American people are really dying in waiting this program every week just to know those who are very dangerous.
As for me, I believe that Mr. George W. Bush deserves to be the most important hero in this program, and I elect his name to rise above all of his colleagues of crime since the time of independence of the United States of America until about thirty decades from now!
One above all, the man has a very especial quality that distinguishing him from his other “wanted” colleagues. He has the most powerful weapons in the world for free.
The thing that is really dangerous when a Bush like him has the right to order to use them, especially when we hear an American official source not assuring that U.S.A will not use nuclear weapon if it strikes Iraq!
We've never heard anything like that from U.S.A since Harry Truman! Anyway, I'm sorry to say “a Bush” because I could not – and no one really can – find any other word to describe the man or his attitude.
Beside, he has a very pure Arabic leader characteristic, which is lying. Is his first speech he delivered, he said, “the American policy will be very humble.”
Now, as see the American policy has become everything but humble! And I remember now his colleague Clinton when he lied under oath, all America raised against him, although the man lied to save his dignity and made no harm to anyone but himself, while Mr. Bush lied to disturb the world's dignity, and has made a harm to everyone but himself!
Furthermore, there are two disastrous things about his lying. He is making his assistance to do it. And they are doing it very badly as if they are addressing a five years old kid!
The lovely example is when a CNN interviewer interviewed those responsible for external affairs in the White House. I will not comment on what was said because the phrase will prove my vision automatically.
It was said “there is a misunderstanding” from all, the mission of the inspectors is not to search for weapons of mass destruction! The mission is just to destroy them because they exist! Then if Iraq did not give the inspectors its weapons, this means Iraq is not cooperating and we must disarm it by force!
Another reason is his adhering to his father cowboying lessons in ruling the world. The first lesson says, “Son, if you have any internal problem, just strike any weak nation.”
“And I do believe” – the father is still talking- “that Iraq is a very great target. I tried it and it worked amazingly.”
“Iraq it is!” shouted Bush the junior ordered the world to follow him.
The final and strongest reason is his stupidity! I heard in one occasion -during the crisis of Afghanistan – one ex-president of the United States describing Bush as a hunk of stupidity walking on two legs! By the way, there is an American woman I've chatted with a couple of times on the Internet. Her name is N. Hopkins from South Carolina, and she has very funny comments in this field.
She wrote to me once “We had no good president since Gerald Ford and we had no worse president than Bush!”
Another time she wrote, “If we got a chance to have three or four like Bush I guaranty that U.S.A will be poorer and smaller than Comoro Islands!”
Anyway, no good example is better than Bush's claims about a magic relation between Iraq and Al Qaida! The funny thing is C.I.A former leaders commented “what kind of relation can be found between a strict Islamic gang aiming to fight the west and the Communists including socialists and a Socialist party which has a very cruel history fighting with strict Islamic Groups?”
With all these reasons I don't know if he can go more than this; with his faults that we pay for. But even if he can, this does not mean he is good or right but it means that we – the world and Arabic humans – are even worse than him.
——
[archive-e:624-v:13-y:2003-d:2003-02-24-p:opinion]