Perspective depends on where you areWhat is ‘terrorism’? [Archives:2003/624/Opinion]

ABDUALBARI TAHER

From the very beginning of the national resistance on the countries which termed as the third world countries, the struggle towards independence called terror by colonizers.
The Algerian struggle against French colonization considered to be a terror, the peaceful struggle for the Great India against Britain was also considered to be terror. The same thing can be applied to China, Vietnam, Cambodia and Korea when they fought against Japanese invaders also. Then, the British and French and now the Americans.
Since the tragic incidents on September 11 against Washington DC and New York, the US has intended to regain the use of the term “terror” and therefore the term itself has been misapprehended.
No clear identification has been yet determined and as a result the US couldn't differentiate between terror and the right of national resistance of nations.
Attacking the twin towers is an aggression against one of the strongest human civilizations.
The whole nations have strongly condemned that horrible terror.
It signifies the depression, frustration and targeting the innocent civilians.
Destroying the twin towers, the US administration has found an excuse to launch more aggressive wars and crimes which have threatened the international safety and security.
The US has amassed fleets and armies to the Arab Peninsula. Thousands of Americans as well as British soldiers have been deployed to wage war against Iraq after Afghanistan.
This has reminded us of returning to the 'Old Colonization'.
It is time for the US administration to complete its waging inferno policies to strike and invade Iraq.
After the terrible September 11 incidents, the US has been attempting to impose its power and seize silence prevailed on the entire Arab nations.
The US sovereignty and security has been given priority compared to the security of other nations in the world.
On this basis, the US security means the security and safety of the entire mankind.
As opposed to this, destabilizing the US safety and its interests means showing enmity towards those nations.
The limited sovereignty of nations has been removed by the US policies. i.e.. any challenge or threat against the colonized interest is called 'terror'.
The US after the September 11 attacks is not just concerned to remove the right of the national resistance, it gives itself the right to resist and fight possible threat, “US-led war campaign against terror). US measures its right to govern the world by its power and its military superiority .
As a superpower, the US has the absolute right to dominate the world and also fought tooth and nails to force the world to side with the US, otherwise, those countries will be convicted of terror and that they will not escape punishment.
It also has given itself the right to determine what is good and what is bad for the humanity.
The US is the only superpower to choose democracy for nations along with its system.
The US-led war against Iraq is a liberation for Iraq itself. Similarly, the US sees that the war against Palestinians is another form of counter-terrorism.
The Palestinian where his land has been occupied for about 48 years, perceived as a terrorist and that the Israelis, the colonizers, are perceived as strugglers against terror and called peace-lovers. Undoubtedly, it is a kind US-Israeli imperial policies.
The French, German, Russian, Chinese stance towards aggression against Iraq has made clear that the US insists on exceeding the Security Council resolutions and its desire to remove those members from participation in self-determining in one of the most dangerous regions in the world.
This is not only attributed to the oil existence, it is also due to its historical significance all the history long.
US also have the desire to marginalize those permanent members from the decision-making.
It also bits of imposing the reality as it sees that the USSR disintegration and the week stance of Arab nations and other world countries will enable the US to lead the war choice.
Despite of the international community objection as well as the increasing officially and non-officially opposition against war, US has been making hasty steps recklessly and arrogantly towards war.
The US administration cherishes to enact forcibly a new international resolution to make US lead the war.
But at the same time the US is ready to launch war single-handedly along with other remaining allies.
The US sees that during the 29the century and 21th century that the world will accept at length of what has been imposed by a superpower.
The US-led war against Iraq has become (semidefinite) in the presence of thousands American as well as British soldiers and around $13 billion have been spent on amassing military armies in the region.
The international community is not able to resist before the US arrogance where the Security Council seems to be docile as if its orders were unquestioned.
The international community has got a weak stance towards the Security Council compared to the US where it has more pressures more than the Congress.
The US wants to single-handedly take the decision making and then dentate its order on other members.
The US's attitude in the Middle East is no longer needed to conceal its hidden motives and wants to reshape the map of the region according to its own oil interests where it has the lion's share in this regard.
It wants to impose normalization and siding with Israel in the Palestinian issue and this undoubtedly terror No. #.
America after 11 September attack has divided the world into good and evil axis and labeled Iraq, Iran and North Korea as evil axis countries.
Accordingly, the weak stance of the Arab regimes and its dictatorship has made the Arab a convenient magnet for applying anti-racial and ugly aggressiveness.
The US violent terror manifests itself in imposing single-handed dictatorship on the world trying to remove alteration, change, and differences of the international decision-making centers.
The African leader's cry, Nilson Mandila, against cowboy has come from Texas, “Bush” has a deep indication to realize the discriminative dimension to insult the, Kofi Anan, the Secretary General.
The US power which diverts to sacred and absolute right can not remove human heritage based on resisting the right of nations to fight aggressors and that the human history is based on these great moral values.
As a strongest superpower, the US will not be able to remove the existing nature of the world which includes diversity, differences, similarities of the civilization centers and human history.
The history repeat itself, tyrants and oppressors such as Niroon, Holako, Jenkeez Khan, Shamshon, the dictator and now Bush remove the difference between fighting invaders, imperialists, and terrorism. Taliban and al-Qaeda are a real terrorists made by the US in a given time.
Any super power in the world during the phases of history couldn't deface injustice or mix with it.
The gravest thing is that the US arrogance has reached to a level where it thinks that its power is sacred and everlasting.
The US couldn't remove the right of resisting terror in the Arab nations and allowing its lands to be blundered by invaders.
The US can declare the beginning of its war but can not declare its end.
——
[archive-e:624-v:13-y:2003-d:2003-02-24-p:opinion]