So what is after Bush’s incessant interference? [Archives:2003/669/Opinion]

By Abdullah Shawqi Hussein
For the Yemen Times
It is fairly noticed that the incessant interference of the US administration in the world states' affairs has become a normal phenomenon.
As a superpower, the US desire to dominate the world has become evidently clear and now it has reaped its own actions.
The world opinion knows the US's foreign intentions and this is clearly shown in the opposition and demonstrations staged in protest against the US foreign policy.
To begin with, the Bush's disinterest to the world's protests when adopting his impetuous strategy, his heedless proclamations in general and the UN's futile and prejudicing resolutions in particular, have conveyed a sense of irony to the world's opinion.
The world's coolness towards Bush's haughtiness has made the him interfere in the world countries' affairs. The US in this case has become more curious to interfere and it has got the upper-hand in issuing resolutions for its own benefit and that the UN has become less effective.
This manifests itself when the US has amassed military fleets to the Mideast region and interfered and invaded Afghanistan and then Iraq.

Liberian appeal to America to appease the insurgents spreading throughout the country has been done legally.
Trying to have no opponents at all, Bush has made all his efforts to annihilate whoever has an atom of daring to merely say, “This is enough, Bush”.
As a matter of fact, such action will undoubtedly result in creating opposition and indignation at his policy, that is, new destructive acts and terrorist movements are to be directed at the US as a result of Bush's own policy.
Similarly, the same consequence will result in the invaded countries along with rise of ethnic groups through them.
What is worth mentioning here is that Mrs. Sharlort Pears, who has recently been in charge of improving the US image through the world said while handing in her resignation, “What ashamed and humiliated to find yourself working to adorn the Evil's face!”
The last and serious point is the successfully thorough implementation of Bush's objectives, especially those of changing rulers who constitute anti-US interests.
What follows driving out those rulers is the climax of Bush's aim which is replacing a new regime, as a substitute for the previous one, that is essentially pro-American design.
Accordingly, Bush will surely appoint those who are allied to him, who cheaply have sold their pride and nationalism. The most seriousness about the new America-chosen government is that is practically always abhorred by the public because it is a group of extremists who care for nothing but self-interests.
It has therefore had a few number of supporters but lots of dissenters.
Actually, we need answers to the following questions.
Is not Bush, through his self-centered thoughts and self-made decisions, planning to devise newly formed UN organization based on the US policy instead the UN present?
Is not the time to boldly put an end to Bush's whims?
Are not goals of Bush's acts mimic those of Nazi dictator of Germany, Hitler?
——
[archive-e:669-v:13-y:2003-d:2003-09-18-p:opinion]